Editor's Tips: Guide to Grey Literature

Editor's Tips: Guide to Grey Literature

Guide to Grey Literature 

Introduction

This guide introduces grey literature—its origins and definitions—and its merits compared to traditional scholarly content. It includes a list of key grey literature databases and a short bibliography for further reading.

What is grey literature?

Grey literature is material of interest to researchers and students that’s published informally, without using the traditional academic formats of books and journals. It includes reports, working papers, policy documents, conference proceedings, theses, and now also born-digital formats like blogs, podcasts, and videos.

Producers of grey literature include:

  • Governments at all levels, producing reports, policy documents, and statistics.

  • Research institutions such as university centers and think tanks, sharing findings through reports and working papers.

  • Companies including consultancies and multinationals, publishing case studies and white papers.

  • Charities and professional networks, producing advocacy reports and evaluations.

  • NGOs like Greenpeace and Oxfam, publishing project-based reports and case studies.

  • IGOs such as the UN, WHO, and OECD, issuing global policy documents and development reports.

Origin of the term and definition

The term grey literature was first used by Charles P. Auger in the 1970s at a conference held by the British Lending Library Division to describe World War II intelligence reports. In 1984, D. N. Wood defined it as material “which is not available through normal bookselling channels … leading to problems for the producers of secondary services, for librarians who wish to collect it, and for end users.”


The Prague Definition (2010), adopted at an international conference on grey literature, defines it as:

“Information produced on all levels of government, academia, business, and industry in both print and electronic formats, not controlled by commercial publishing.”


How does grey literature compare with traditional scholarly journals?

Grey literature uses accessible, practical language aimed at diverse audiences, including policymakers, practitioners, and communities. It often features a wide range of voices—including from the Global South—bringing in local, Indigenous, and underrepresented perspectives. Formats are flexible, and content is action-oriented, focusing on real-world issues and solutions. The publishing process is fast so the information can be very current.


Academic journals, by contrast, follow formal, standardized structures and use technical language intended for scholarly audiences. The peer-review process can limit inclusion, often favoring voices from the Global North and established institutions. As a result, academic writing may lack the diversity of perspectives found in grey literature. The publishing process is slow, it can take months for articles to be published.


Grey literature complements traditional scholarly journals and books by providing additional data, case studies, and real-world examples that are not found in academic publications.

Grey literature and peer review

It is often thought that peer review is exclusive to traditional scholarly publishing.  This is incorrect. As Lawrence (2017) shows, most grey literature undergoes some form of independent review or quality control to ensure the reliability and accuracy of the content. Organizations producing grey literature sometimes include a description of the review process in the front matter - some list as many as 80 reviewers. They have every incentive to ensure the quality of their outputs; their good reputation—and future funding—is at stake every time they publish. In traditional publishing, a journal’s brand acts as a quality mark; in gray literature, the organization’s brand plays the same role.


Grey Literature Resources

Grey Literature Resources

Description

Coverage

URL

Current resources




Analysis & Policy Observatory (APO)

APO indexes selected public policy research and resources from governments, NGOs and other sources in Australia and New Zealand. ~40,000 items.

Since 2002

https://apo.org.au/

BASE (Bielefeld Academic Search Engine)

BASE is one of the world's most comprehensive search engines for academic open access web resources, including grey literature from institutional repositories and digital collections.

Since 1980s

https://www.base-search.net/

Policy Commons

The world's most comprehensive discovery and preservation service for reports, papers, blogs and podcasts from governments, cities, think tanks, IGOs, NGOs, research centers, projects, inquiries, charities, and other organizations. Global coverage. 18+ million full-text items from 40,000+ organizations.

Since 1980s

https://policycommons.net/ 

Applied Science Commons

Applied science content from nontraditional sources—such as hospitals, industry, and professional groups. Reports, case studies, technical documents, and social media. 2+ million items from 8,000+ organizations.

Since 2000

https://appliedsciencecommons.net/ 

Research Papers in Economics (RePEc)

The world's largest bibliographic index of working papers in economics. ~1 million papers from ~5,500 series.

Since 1980s

https://econpapers.repec.org/

WorldWideScience

WorldWideScience is a global science gateway that allows users to search across multiple international scientific databases, including some grey literature sources.

Since 1980s

https://worldwidescience.org/

Historical Resources
(no longer updated)




Africa Portal

The Africa Portal was a research repository and an expert analysis hub on African affairs. Produced by South African Institute of International Affairs (SAIIA) and the Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI). ~10,000 items. 

2010-2022

The collection is now part of Policy Commons: Global Think Tanks https://policycommons.net/modules/global-think-tanks/

Grey Literature Report

The Grey Literature Report (GreyLit Report) was a comprehensive urban health resource produced by The New York Academy of Medicine between 1999 and 2016.

1999-2016


National Grey Literature Collection (allcatsaregrey)

A historic collection of UK health policy grey literature in hard copy, collected since the late 1980s-2015 and electronic grey literature from 2016-2022. 

2016-2022

No longer online. The physical collection is being transferred to the King's Fund.

OpenGrey (OpenSIGLE)

The System for Information on Grey Literature in Europe (SIGLE) - also known as OpenGrey, contained ~1 million bibliographical references of grey literature produced in Europe between 1980-2005. 

1980-2005

You can download the bibliographic records from https://doi.org/10.17026/dans-xtf-47w5



Further reading/listening about grey literature

1. Wood, D. N. (1990). Management of Grey Literature (chapter). Management of Recorded Information. K.G. Saur. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111514598.61 


2. Marsolek, Wanda et al. (2021). Grey literature: Advocating for diverse voices, increased use, improved access, and preservation. College & Research Libraries News, 82(2). https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.82.2.58


3. Lawrence, Amanda (2017). Influence seekers: The production of grey literature for policy and practice. Information Services and Use, 37(4). https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-170857 


4. Green, Toby (2022).  Wait! What? There’s stuff missing from the scholarly record? Medical Writing, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.56012/ajel9043 


5. Wikipedia: Grey Literature https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grey_literature 


6. GreyLit Cafe Podcast https://policycommons.net/collections/65674/the-grey-lit-cafe-podcast/


7. Bringing Research into the Light (Video) https://youtu.be/ocOhs_M23mE?si=398137Lj4__5D_L6 


8. Citing Gray Literature (Video) https://youtu.be/z-fpFIzhgj4?si=JteioUtEjeDxzB6J 


9. Is Gray Literature Peer Reviewed? (Video) https://youtu.be/fRq32WwPHHE?si=5U6COJj_0OicScQO